Gun Control

Gun Control annon AI say all guns are good guns. There are no bad guns. I say the whole nation should be an armed nation. [email protected] This rather bold statement was made by Joseph Foss. Former Governor Joseph Foss, a former fighter pilot for the US Air Force, is the current President of the NRA, or National Rifle Association (Lacayo 16). The NRA is a special interest group known by many. Its members are stereotyped to be a group of >truck-driving=, pompous, huntsmen. Indeed this is partially true, as 97% of all NRA members are suburban men.

Because the organization is a more >Domestic Blend=, it is a surprising fact that the NRA is a powerful lobbyist organization. And skeptically viewed upon by many people (Lacayo 19). As a lobbyist organization, the NRA has a current main objective of protecting American citizens= rights, to possess and operate a firearm, form being violated by gun control laws. One of the NRA=s main weapons in this crusade is the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. The amendment=s translation in the eyes of the NRA and many American citizens, clearly protects the individual rights of all citizens to possess and operate firearms. This would easily make any and all gun control laws unconstitutional.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

And therefore illegal. This translation, however, is not accepted by all people. Including the United States Government. They believe that the amendment guaranteed no right for individual citizens to possess weaponry, but merely allowed for the government to form and maintain an armed service (IE. United States Army, US.

Navy). Because of the different translations of our constitution, gun control can be viewed by different people in different ways (Lacayo 20). Some of the many gun control bans and laws wich are under constant hellfire from the NRA are those pertaining to self-defense. Under current laws, like those of Texas, require that people MUST retreat and be pursued by the intruder before any means of force could be taken upon the would-be attacker. Unfortunately, arguments of >criminal=s rights=, and >excessive force=, put to rest thoughts of a possible veto of some bans. With some effort from anti-gun control groups, such as the NRA, some of these laws have been lifted. Also, laws pertaining to self-defense and property protection have come to be passed as well.

Some laws also help to protect homeowners form civil suites made by wounded would-be attackers/intruders (Ward F3). Another example of unwanted (and unneeded) gun violence restriction laws, was the famous AK-47 crisis. Due to governmental handgun bans, the military issue AK-47 became easily accessible, due to the extended barrel, wich allowed the assault weapon to fall under more lenient gun bans. The weapon quickly became a favorite weapon of thieves and one wich created many a drive-by-shooting victim. In one such case, an AK-47 was used in the massacre of many school children. The rifle had been attained legally.

One can begin to wonder just how many of these violent crimes could have been prevented by a self-defense weapon. The attacks by the automatic assault weapon eventually led to more strict assault weapon bans (Hancock C2). Nevertheless, the percentile of assault weapons related to violent crimes has in facet decreased only a minuscule amount. Wich tends to lead experts to believe that many assault weapon related crimes were done with illegal weapons. After all, it would be somewhat illogical of people to commit crimes wich were easily traced back to them by means of a simple background check of assault weapon owners (Hancock C2). It should be noted, that not all forms of gun control are intolerable.

73% of the 70 million gun owners in America declared that mandatory gun registration exist. 87% of the voters stated that background checks be required (Lacayo 17). One form of gun control wich was very minutely argued, was the AToys for [email protected], incentive. The incentive allowed for $100 in toys, to be given to anyone who turns in a weapon. It was viewed as a safe way to get guns off the street.

It was, however, considered an unsuccessful action. The guns recovered were not considered to be those that were being used in violent crime (the weapons the incentive was aimed at). Only 317 weapons were recovered. I personally was surprised that >entrapment= wasn=t called on this one (Silvers C11). The past few actions were relatively unopposed by the NRA.

As they were not active attempts to restrict the individual rights of firearm possession. The acts below however, are examples of >undesired= gun control methods. In recent years, councilmen passed acts to limit weaponry. New restrictions not only allowed for the sale of personal weaponry to be sold further (in an attempt to keep firearm levels at a constant), but also to have particular weapons to be collected from homes, and removed from the city and destroyed (Spielman C1). Transportation of weaponry also came under fire. Firearms could not be brought to gun stores or clubs, unless the weapons were disassembled and made inoperable. Any vehicle containing a weapon was immediately seized, and searched.

Available to the owner again only after severe penalties were paid (Speilman C1). Some bills wich had been attempted to have been passed called for the forbiddance of sale of firearms to known gang members. And also called for the right to search for weapons on the persons of anyone who was loitering. Through some effort of anti-gun control campaigns and petitions, the bills were vetoed (Spielman C1). Although the ban of guns and gun related items will indeed help to lower violent crime, it can also lead to an increase.

If a criminal with an illegally attained firearm goes and attempts a violent crime, with the reassurance of his own health because the person he intended to injure would not be able to defend themselves..Then the crime would more likely be more violent. By taking guns away from the people, you take away some of the defense that person has for his or her family, property, and life. Self-defense is a great cause for the purchase of a weapon. In the run-around of gun control laws between the NRA, and Mr. Brady, it begins to seem as if the issue is no longer as important as who wins. I believe that common sense should be used more in these issues, instead of statistics.

There is no parenthetical reference for this paragraph, as it is my opinion. Guns were invented hundreds of years ago. The purpose of the weapons were to allow a small man to be as powerful as a big man. They were built to protect the weak from the strong. Guns restriction merely allows the stronger to conquer the weak, as was done in the day of the sword and spear (Peterson 10). I should hope we live in a more sophisticated time.

Thank you. LIST OF WORKS CITED Ward, Mike. AProposals Give More Leeway for [email protected] Austin American- Standard 7 Mar.1995 :F3. Hancock, David. AHandgun Is Harder To Buy Than [email protected] Miami Herald 24 Jul. 1992: C2-C3.

Peterson, Harold L. A History of Firearms. New York: Charles Scribner=s sons, 1961. Lacayo, Richard. AWho is the [email protected] Time-The Weekly Magazine 29 Jan.

1990: 16-24. Speilman, Fran. ACouncil Approves Tougher Gun [email protected] Chicago Sun Times 8 Jul. 1992: C1. Silvers, Susan. ALandmark Norwalk Kids Store Offers Toys-for-Guns [email protected] Connecticut Post 30 Dec. 1993: G11.

Travers, Bridget. World of Invention. Detroit: Gale Research Inc. 1994. -By Joshua A. Novak.

Gun Control

Gun Control The United States of America is the most heavily armed population in the world. There are 200 Million guns and 60 to 65 Million legal owners who have one or more guns. In the United States, more than half of the households have guns. In 1974, nearly two million guns were produced in the United States, and four hundred thousand guns were imported. In 1975, the House Judiciary Committee Report Number 94-1103 stated that there were about three hundred thousand actual or potential handgun deaths annually! Those figures are increasing rapidly, if we do not do anything to stop it, it will became a disaster in the future.

The definition of a gun is a device that discharges a shot, shells, or bullets from a straight tube by a spark-producing mechanism that ignites the gunpowder. Although there are several different kind of guns, they all work in the same way.( Gun, Encarta ’95) Many people think that the second amendment gives the United States Citizen the right to bear arm. However, according to the Supreme Court decision on October 3, 1983, the possession of handguns by individuals is not part of the right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment only applies to the states’ right to keep militaries(Long 78). Some people believe that guns do not kill people, that people kill people. Yet handguns are used 2.5 times more often than any other murder weapon.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

We require driver licenses for vehicles and drivers, so it is necessary to require licensing for the more dangerous weapons-guns. Mr. Charles Orasin, the vice president of the National Council to Control Handguns said that the gun control laws are only anti-crime laws, they do not regulate the citizens from using firearms for legal purposes. (Dolan 76, 100) The most dangerous kind of firearm is a cheaply made handgun, who also called Saturday Night Special. They are dangerous because they are easy to get and most of the crimes are committed by them.

They are short in the barrel, low in caliber, and made of inferior materials, they only cost a few dollars, so anyone who wanted to commit a crime can afford to buy one. (Dolan 53-54) Guns are not only useless, but also are dangerous to kept at home. Guns are not very useful for self protection since 90 percent of all break-ins are committed when tenants are away. The guns they keep for self-protection are usually stolen. However, a gun kept for protection is six times more likely to kill someone you know rather than an attacker. Seventy percent of the people killed by handguns are shot by relatives or friends.

A lot of people died in the Vietnam War, but there were more people killed by guns in the United States at the same period of time. There were fifty-eight thousand soldiers, marines, sailors and airmen killed in Vietnam, but three hundred thousand people were killed in the United States by guns!(Dolan 53-54). To keep the people in this nation away from the fear of misuse of guns, the first federal laws were passed in the early 1900s and dealt with both firearms and explosives. In 1927, Congress passed the Mailing of Firearms Acts, which prohibited all but certain people from sending a concealable weapon through mailing. As the time passed, there were more and more problems caused by guns, so we need new standards for our society.

Under present law, a customer’s name and the serial number of the gun are recorded by the dealer when he or she purchases a gun. That information will only be traced within the state. If the gun was used in a crime in other states, that state will have little or no ways of knowing where it came from. In this case, 90 percent of the guns used in crimes are purchased out of state. Another advantage of extending the control to federal lever is to prevent the stolen legal gun into illegal gun. Studies have shown that 35 percent of the guns used in crimes are obtained from pawnshops(Dolan 76-77, 80-81).

As Edward Kennedy, the Senator of Massachusetts said, Our nation is armed to the teeth at home. Our society is becoming an arsenal of criminal anarchy..crime control means gun control. For the safety of the society, not every kind of firearm should be allowed to sell in United States. Some of the firearms, like fully loaded automatic machine guns, are out of the requirement of self-protection. So this kind of weapon should be limited.

(Long 125-133) Gun controls are necessary in this society. The United States of America has the highest rates of criminal violence in the world. We cannot say that it has nothing to do with guns. With strict law enforcement and education on the danger of guns, these gun and crime related problems may be solved. Bibliography Dolan, Edward F.

Jr. Gun Control. New York: A Grolier Company, 1982. Long, Robert Emmet, ed. Gun Control.

New York: The H. W. Wilson Company, 1989. Wright, James D. et al. Under The Gun.

New York: Aldine Publishing Company, 1983. Ahlers, Julia and Wilt, Michael. Christian Justice. Minnesota: Saint Mary’s Press, 1995 Gun Microsoft Encarta’. 1995 edition.

Rifle, Photograph, Microsoft Encarta’. 1995 edition. Hunting, Photograph, Compton Interactive Encyclopedia. 1995 edition.

Gun control

The main definition in the paper I have chose to write is Gun Control. Gun control in essence means to stop the wrong people from getting a hold of guns. The law is made to check the backgrounds of all persons attempting to buy and sell guns. If a person has a history of violence, the gun will not be sold to him or her. This makes sure that less crimes with guns will be committed.

A weapon of destruction can be a gun. An automatic rifle, or an automatic shotgun would be classified into this category. These types of weapons can inflict great amounts of damage in very short periods of time. If a person had one, he or she could walk around the streets and obliterate every object that he or she did not like. These are extremely hard to get legally, but there are many of them floating around illegally. A harsher law against them would get rid of a large amount of these destructive weapons.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

A harsher law means to make the punishment of a crime greater. If laws on gun misuse become stricter, then not so many crimes would happen with them. People would take better care of the weapons they own, and would make sure nobody could just take the weapon and misuse it. This may prevent a child from getting a gun, because the parents would not take a chance, knowing at least one of them would go to jail if their child got the gun and used it for any purpose.

The Bill of Rights is a document that contains all the rights of American citizens. They say what a person can have, and what they can do. If the rights of Americans owning a firearm change, it should not affect any one person to where his or her life would be ruined. If the gun law changes, the rights of Americans will change. In this case, it has an impact on society that appears to be positive.

Firearms are any type of gun. The Bill of Rights says Americans have the right to carry a firearm. This should not be illegal, but why not make restrictions on the firearms that can be carried around. For example, carrying an automatic weapon. One of these guns is not used for hunting or protection. These weapons are designed for one reason, to kill people. Yet these guns are still legal for anyone with a gun license to own.

The reason for these weapons is strictly because the gun companies sponsor congressmen. So they do not want the people who sponsor them to get mad. This is ridiculous. Putting the lives of people at risk for money does not make sense. What good is the congress if the people who are represented by it are dead? It should make congress worthless, but instead it appears that the more people who die, the stronger the politicians in congressional positions become.

Sources Used
America Online. Http://
The World Book Encyclopedia: World Book Inc. 1986.

The Prospectus. A publication of the Iowa State University College of Business.


I'm Lydia!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out