Euthanasia

Euthanasia A man, well into his forties, lies helplessly in the cold room of the hospital. He eagerly waits for the results of his tests that are to be hand delivered by the warm-hearted doctor. He lies there, his skin is pasty white, his body is slowly deteriorating both inside and out, and his hair is gradually falling out. Yet somehow the man manages to fight for his life, striving to be able to go home to his wife, play football with his son, and take his dog Nasia, for a walk. In the faint distance the man can hear the footsteps of the doctor, the sound intensifying as the doctor get closer.

As the physician approaches the door the mans heart thumps louder, and faster, in sync with the sound of the footsteps. Nervously the doctor opens the door, walks inside, and gives the ill man an artificial smile, the kind people give when they pose for pictures. A sound comes out, and the man hears the doctor say, “you have lung cancer, and it is terminal.” His once beating heart sinks to the floor, and all hope flies out of the window into the realm of death. The man, pondering the long road of agony ahead, says to the doctor, “I do not wish to suffer the effects of the cancer, I want to die.” He continues by asking the question every doctor fears to answer, “Can you give me something to end my life?” This process is known as euthanasia. The word stems from Greek origin meaning “good death.” In general, euthanasia is the process of a physician killing a human being who suffers from a painfully terminal disease to bring them peace.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The topic has become quite controversial throughout the United States as well as the rest of the world. Advocates feel that each and every person has the right to be able to choose how they live, and how they die. They claim that everyone should have the privilege of controlling their own destiny. Opponents of mercy killing argue that the act is immoral and would have a negative effect on the social and moral standings of society. They believe that life and death should only be in the hands of God. There are two types of euthanasia, passive and active. Passive euthanasia is taking away or withholding treatment even if the person is going to die.

Active euthanasia is assisting the patient who suffers from the terminal illness to die by giving them drugs or injections. While many argue that only the passive type of euthanasia is acceptable, others argue that morally, there is not a difference between the two, and that neither of them should be conducted. Activists of euthanasia claim that it would be killing in the name of compassion. They argue that any passionate and humane character would not want to see their loved one suffer especially when there is no hope for recovery. Supporters of this technique believe that they are actually helping the sickly individual by easing their discomforts and releasing them of their pains and letting them go on to a “better place,” free of harm, and illnesses. Adversaries of euthanasia state that it is merely degrading the human life.

They support Gods sovereignty of human life, contesting that it is too sacred and too valuable to be taken away by anyone other than God. Enemies of euthanasia have many questions that are left unanswered. For instance, if euthanasia was to become legalized, where do we stop or start? How advanced must the illness be? Are the doctors 100 percent right about the diagnosis? Which illnesses are”treatable” by euthanasia? Are handicaps to be included? Where do we draw the line and who is to make the final decision? Are those in pain even getting the right medicine, the right dosage? Has every treatment option been explored, should they be? These questions cannot be fully answered for every situation that occurs, which leaves many people unsure about the idea of euthanasia and its morality. Supporters on the other hand would state that these questions do not have to be answered by any professional, but by the patients themselves. If they are uncomfortable, depressed, and can no longer bear the cruelties of their illness, then it should be up to them if they want to end their life. Opponents of euthanasia continue their argument by stating that when symptoms of terminally ill patients are diagnosed and treated properly, euthanasia is not a necessary “treatment.” They claim under these conditions, the patients fears are dealt with, help is provided, they feel safe, and rarely ask for death a second time.

Many patients receive excellent palliative care, which makes the ill patients more comfortable. However, people for euthanasia ask the question, “whos to say they are not in pain?” All too often the patients are mute, unconscious, or in a state of coma. There is not one doctor or human being that can accurately predict the amount of pain the patient is undergoing. Different individuals may experience various symptoms with each kind of disease and that makes it tough to estimate the patients level of pain. Also, whos to say that the doctor diagnosed the patient correctly? They are, after all, human, and all beings make mistakes.

Therefore, there is a justifiable reason to say that the patients should be able to make their own decision rather than have the law make it for them.

Euthanasia

.. heir life because they feel like a burden to their family. If this is so, what has the world come to when the people that a patient has known, loved, and respected for so long, makes them feel like a burden. A person is supposed to be able to go to their family for support, that1s what a family is all about. Sticking together and getting through problems the right way, not ending one1s life.

Many times a patient feels like a burden because of treatment costs. The cost of treatment is way too high for many patients to afford, so they go to their families. But rather than support and help, the patient gets resistance and feels as though they have become a burden. This causes them to want to turn to death, rather than trouble the one group of people that are supposed to be there for help in times of need. Furthermore, without passive euthanasia millions of lives can be saved. A law has to be made to stop these 3mercy killings.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

There are thousands of people that are seriously hospitalized with a terminal disease or a coma. An estimated ten- thousand of these hospitalized patients die daily. Seventy percent of these deaths are a direct result of 3secretly withdrawing life support. Yes, everyday a number of patients die from a family member paying a visit to them and 3pulling the plug while the doctor isn1t around. It1s bad enough that we have so many troubles with general homicides and suicides, but now it1s time to concern ourselves with the killings that are going on in hospitals. The institution that we go to for good health, security, and treatment is doing just the opposite and it needs to be stopped.

If a law is passed that makes euthanasia illegal, then people will definitely think twice before helping someone end their life. There has to be price to pay for helping one commit suicide, it should not be taken lightly. By passing a law against euthanasia, thousand of lives will be saved. Next is the issue of active euthanasia, actively taking measures to help end the life of another. This is the type of euthanasia practiced by Doctor Jack Kavorkian and argued about all over the world.

Many important issues surface when discussing active euthanasia. First, there is the argument that a person has the right to choose. Each individual should be able to make the decision of whether or not they want to live in pain or die with dignity. Otherwise people are just like robots that are controlled by laws, society and always have to do what others think is right. But is giving up a life and committing suicide really dignified? There is always the chance of coming out of a coma and finding a cure for a disease. Thousands of doctors are working to find cures for every terminal disease all over the world.

When there1s the chance of being cured like there always is, there is no reason to commit suicide. No matter how anyone looks at it or says it, suicide is not dignified. Everyone has the right to choose, but it the choices are how to lead and live their life, not end it. And there is nothing robotic about following laws that are made to protect the people and the society they live in. Choices about how one1s life will end aren1t to be made by oneself, they can choose how to lead their life but there is no dignity gained by committing suicide.

Secondly, just because something is considered to be sinful by the Bible or in any other religion, doesn1t mean it should be a crime. We live in a democracy where the people, of all religions, make the laws. They shouldn’t be based on any religion or religious book. But we1re not talking about the sin of suicide, where talking about euthanasia. Euthanasia is assisted suicide, but isn1t that just a nice name for homicide. Suicide is killing oneself, but how can you assist yourself.

The assistant is another person who is guilty of conspiracy to commit murder. Laws are already passed against murder. When someone takes part in euthanasia they1re not going to be on trial for attempted suicide because they weren1t trying to kill themselves, they were taking the life of another. It1s murder and there1s no other way to look at it. Next is the belief that active euthanasia should be tolerated in order to save agony and pain for both the family and patient.

No one should have to go through so much agony over a long period of time. Many think that it1s torture not to help dying patients. Kavorkian accused opposing physicians of being “Nazi doctors” who torture and experiment with the poor and unfortunate. However, what is the agony and pain? It is the agony and pain of death and it has to be faced either way, but it shouldn’t be because of a suicide. We should face the pain and agony with strength and determination.

The patients need to be determined to hang on and fight for cures. It1s not torture to keep someone alive in hopes of a cure. And if a patient is that ill, then they aren1t really going through that much physical pain, it1s the mental and emotional states of patients that need to be secured. That1s the reason many turn to suicide, they are unhappy with their lives so they begin to decline mentally and emotionally. And as far as experimenting goes, no experimental drug or procedure is forced upon any patient, including the elderly and incompetent. And what do they have to lose anyway? Most don’t mind using experimental drugs because it just may be the cure they1re looking for.

There is nothing “Nazi” about testing drugs and cures in hopes of saving a life. There is no torture or direct result of death. So, in actuality there is no physical agony or pain saved in euthanasia because that’s not what the patients are going through. It just shortens the mental and physical pain that can be helped in other ways than death. Either way, suicide is no answer to pain.

Euthanasia

An eighty-seven year old grandmother on a respirator, a
newborn child with AIDS, and a father in a coma; all put to death
by respectable doctors with the O.K. of their families. But is
it really 3O.K.? Euthanasia, or doctor-assisted suicide, has
become as common as jumping off of a fifteen story building or
taking a gun to one1s own head. Certainly society frowns upon
suicide, but yet putting an old lady or a man in a coma to death
is being accepted every day. Society knows that suicide is bad,
but euthanasia is even worse. The guilt and blame of a lost life
is falling on the hands of doctor1s that we are supposed to
trust, and even worse, the family members themselves. A doctor
is to be known as a healer, not an agent of death. A family is
supposed to love and support, not kill and inherit. Every person
makes the light of the world brighter. The world needs
everyone1s power and contribution. It1s the power and energy of
the elderly, and the strength and will of the ill, that give the
world life. The light has become very dim with the crime and
corruption in today1s world, we can1t afford to throw lives away
because some think they1re meaningless. If we continue to accept
the merciless killings and suicides of the helpless but powerful,
the light will soon burn out. There will be no energy in the
world. Euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide should not be
accepted or allowed by the government and people of the United
States.

Statistics show that seventy-three percent of the U.S.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

population approved of some form of euthanasia. This is used
constantly in debates to pass laws for making euthanasia legal.

But the people are deceived by this number. When the poll was
taken, the people were asked if they approved of “some form” of
euthanasia. There are two forms of euthanasia, active and
passive. It is the passive euthanasia that many people are
accepting, the less harsh of the two. That’s why people
generally say they approve of it. If a separate question was
asked or the people were informed of the difference, we would
find that only thirty-eight percent of the population approves of
active suicide, as used by Kavorkian. So the fact that people
approve of euthanasia is irrelevant because only thirty-eight
percent would actually pass a law if they knew that Kavorkian1s
methods would be allowed.

However, it is said that passive euthanasia, suicide by the
removal of life support, is a long-time practice for hospitalized
patients. But does this make it O.K?I should think not. Many
things have been accepted and practiced in the world, and many of
them have become illegal. Not too long ago a teenager could
drink whenever he wanted. Now we have laws to regulate the
drinking age. This is the same type of thing, something terrible
has going on for too long now. We need to put a stop to the
killings with a law. Just because something has been allowed and
occurring for a long time doesn1t mean that it1s O.K. Also,
there is the issue of living wills. A living will is a document
that protects the right of choice in end of life matters for
patients. And not everyone has a living will when they become
ill even though they don1t want to live through the agony and
pain. They just don1t think to make one or plan on being ill and
incompetent. But with or without a living will, it1s just not
right to end a life, even if it1s one1s own. Many think that
they should be able to decide on their own, but what about their
families. The family will spend the rest of their lives
wondering in agony and pain about whether or not a cure would
have been found or if the patient would have made it out
of the coma. It wouldn1t be right to spread the pain by adding
to the fire.But some say, 3Why waste the money and extend the
pain and agony by keeping someone on a machine? We need to look
at life in a more positive way. We need to weigh the matters
evenly. What1s more important, the life of a family member or
trying to save money and pain. Clearly it is the life, nothing
is more important than that. Approximately one billion dollars
is spent on life support patients annually. But the cost of
keeping people alive is irrelevant if there is a chance that
they may be cured or come out of a coma.

More importantly, we need to look at the reasons why it1s
used, not just what people think about it. Life and death is a
huge issue, a person can1t afford to be pressured into a drastic
decision about their life. Whether it1s unconscious or not,
doctors, family friends may pressure a patient to choose death.

We need to eliminate the option or we1ll always have the
issue of whether or not the patient was pressured into suicide.

That is certainly not right. It probably doesn1t make sense that
family members would actually pressure a loved one into suicide,
but money is the real issue. The doctors can make a lot of money
and the families will save on medical bills while inheriting a
lot of money and belongings. Think about the disabled, retarded,
unassertive, poor, and even the elderly. All very vulnerable to
an influential person. Yes, even little Ool grandma. Americans
aged eighty-five and older is the largest category faced with
euthanasia. In 1950 there were over a half of a million
Americans aged eighty-five and older and by 1990 that number grew
to 3.1 million. With the medical technology we have and the
progress we are making to improve today, the number of Americans
older than eighty-five will be more than twice that of 1990 in
the year 2005. We are spending millions of dollars for medical
technology to save lives, we shouldn1t let live be thrown away
when hard working citizens are paying taxes to help keep them
alive.

Also, the reasons that euthanasia is used may just be flat
out wrong. Many times, a patient gives up their life because
they feel like a burden to their family. If this is so, what has
the world come to when the people that a patient has known,
loved, and respected for so long, makes them feel like a burden.

A person is supposed to be able to go to their family for
support, that1s what a family is all about. Sticking together
and getting through problems the right way, not ending one1s
life. Many times a patient feels like a burden because of
treatment costs. The cost of treatment is way too high for many
patients to afford, so they go to their families. But rather than
support and help, the patient gets resistance and feels as though
they have become a burden. This causes them to want to turn to
death, rather than trouble the one group of people that are
supposed to be there for help in times of need.

Furthermore, without passive euthanasia millions of lives
can be saved. A law has to be made to stop these 3mercy
killings. There are thousands of people that are seriously
hospitalized with a terminal disease or a coma. An estimated ten-
thousand of these hospitalized patients die daily. Seventy
percent of these deaths are a direct result of 3secretly
withdrawing life support. Yes, everyday a number of patients
die from a family member paying a visit to them and 3pulling the
plug while the doctor isn1t around. It1s bad enough that we
have so many troubles with general homicides and suicides, but
now it1s time to concern ourselves with the killings that are
going on in hospitals. The institution that we go to for
good health, security, and treatment is doing just the opposite
and it needs to be stopped. If a law is passedthat makes
euthanasia illegal, then people will definitely think twice
before helping someone end their life. There has to be price to
pay for helping one commit suicide, it should not be taken
lightly. By passing a law against euthanasia, thousand of lives
will be saved.

Next is the issue of active euthanasia, actively taking
measures to help end the life of another. This is the type of
euthanasia practiced by Doctor Jack Kavorkian and argued
about all over the world. Many important issues surface when
discussing active euthanasia. First, there is the argument that a
person has the right to choose. Each individual should be able
to make the decision of whether or not they want to live in pain
or die with dignity.Otherwise people are just like robots that
are controlled by laws, society and always have to do what others
think is right. But is giving up a life and committing suicide
really dignified? There is always the chance of coming out of
a coma and finding a cure for a disease. Thousands of doctors
are working to find cures for every terminal disease all over the
world. When there1s the chance of being cured like there always
is, there is no reason to commit suicide. No matter how anyone
looks at it or says it, suicide is not dignified. Everyone has
the right to choose, but it the choices are how to lead and live
their life, not end it. And there is nothing robotic about
following laws that are made to protect the people and the
society they live in. Choices about how one1s life will end
aren1t to be made by oneself, they can choose how to lead their
life but there is no dignity gained by committing suicide.

Secondly, just because something is considered to be sinful by
the Bible or in any other religion, doesn1t mean it should be a
crime. We live in a democracy where the people, of all
religions, make the laws. They shouldn’t be based on any
religion or religious book. But we1re not talking about the sin
of suicide, where talking about euthanasia. Euthanasia is
assisted suicide, but isn1t that just a nice name for homicide.

Suicide is killing oneself, but how can you assist yourself. The
assistant is another person who is guilty of conspiracy to commit
murder. Laws are already passed against murder. When someone
takes part in euthanasia they1re not going to be on trial for
attempted suicide because they weren1t trying to kill themselves,
they were taking the life of another. It1s murder and there1s no
other way to look at it. Next is the belief that active
euthanasia should be tolerated in order to save agony and pain
for both the family and patient. No one should have to go
through so much agony over a long period of time.

Many think that it1s torture not to help dying patients.

Kavorkian accused opposing physicians of being “Nazi doctors” who
torture and experiment with the poor and unfortunate. However,
what is the agony andpain? It is the agony and pain of death
and it has to be faced either way, but it shouldn’t be because of
a suicide. We should face the pain and agony with strength and
determination. The patients need to be determined to hang on
and fight for cures. It1s not torture to keep someone alive in
hopes of a cure. And if a patient is that ill, then they aren1t
really going through that much physical pain, it1s the mental and
emotional states of patients that need to be secured. That1s the
reason many turn to suicide, they are unhappy with their lives
so they begin to decline mentally and emotionally. And as far as
experimenting goes, no experimental drug or procedure is forced
upon any patient, including the elderly and incompetent. And
what do they have to lose anyway? Most don’t mind using
experimental drugs because it just may be the cure they1re
looking for. There is nothing “Nazi” about testing drugs and
cures in hopes of saving a life. There is no torture or direct
result of death. So, in actuality there is no physical agony or
pain saved in euthanasia because that’s not what the patients are
going through. It just shortens the mental and physical pain
that can be helped in other ways than death. Either way, suicide
is no answer to pain.

EUTHANASIA

The word Euthanasia comes from two Greek words which together mean “good health.” Administering active euthanasia could be understood as “inducing the death of a person who is undergoing intense suffering, and who has no realistic hope of recovery.” The main motive behind euthanasia is to release a person from his misery, and active euthanasia is often called “mercy killing.”
We now know the first type of euthanasia is active euthanasia, or inducing death. The second type of euthanasia is passive euthanasia, which is “choosing not to provide or withdrawing life-sustaining equipment, surgery or medications from a patient, when such action may result in his death. Passive euthanasia does not take his life but allows the person to live or die without extraordinary medical efforts to keep him alive. Sometimes people have lived much longer than anticipated and some have even fully recovered when such life support techniques have been withdrawn in passive euthanasia.


In active and passive euthanasia we break them down even further defining each into categories. We have 1) voluntary active euthanasia, 2) involuntary active euthanasia, 3) voluntary passive euthanasia, 4) involuntary passive euthanasia. Each of these categories may include a number of variables from case to case.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now


The big question, is euthanasia morally right or wrong? Well, put yourself in the shoes of many facing the same question. Your child is born with a severe mental handicap that does not allow him to even breath properly. Your mother has terminal cancer, her suffering is horribly painful, and she pleads with you to give her a pill that will put her to sleep for good. Your father has been in a coma for 12 months and depends on a hospital respirator for every breath.


Now consider the advances of modern technology and how it is able to sustain life far beyond the point of where death should have occurred naturally. These great advances are sometimes the curse and not the cure, not just for the ones suffering the illness but also for the loved ones and families who must sit by and watch the suffering that will surely end in death anyway. And now I ask. What should the Christian think in such a case? What should he do? What does the Bible say?
The Bible offers many relevant ethical issues regarding euthanasia which usually fall into three categories-direct commands, examples and principles.


(Ex. 20:13) “Thou shalt not kill”
(Gen. 9:6) ” Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed, for in the image of GOD made he man”
(Gen. 9:35) “And Jesus went about all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the Kingdom, and healing every sickness and every disease among the people”
The Bible clearly tells us not to kill. However, the Bible talks a lot about having mercy on ones neighbors and loved ones.

Euthanasia

Euthanasia Public opinion for euthanasia and doctor assisted suicide has always been mixed. A poll that was taken by the Gallup Organization in Canada during July 1995 proves that people are starting to see the advantages of euthanasia. The first question that was asked was: “When a person has an incurable disease that is immediately life threatening and causes that person to experience great suffering, do you, or do you not think that competent doctors should be allowed by law to end the patient’s life through mercy killing, if the patient has made a formal request in writing?” It is proven in this first question that the general public believes that cases of great pain and suffering deserve the right to choose euthanasia as an option to stop the pain. Three quarters of the people surveyed believed that the choice should be given to the patient. The second question was about non-immediate life threatening cases: “When a person has an incurable disease that is not immediately life-threatening but causes that person to experience great suffering, do you, or do you not think that competent doctors should be allowed by law to end the patient’s life through mercy killing, if the patient has made a formal request in writing?” As you can see, when a case is not immediately life threatening, the general publics answer is mixed.

The people who answered no may be thinking of treatment that has not been tried yet or treatment that may come in the future due to new technologies. Medical Advancements: During the last 20 years, technological advancement has increased more than the advancement of the whole time of man before that. People that have the no opinion on euthanasia may be thinking that the person may be saved by a sudden medical advancement. It would be terrible for a member of your family to take a lethal dose of drugs, given to them by a doctor, to find the next day while reading a recent medical journal that a cure had been found a few days before. How would you feel?.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now
x

Hi!
I'm Lydia!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out